Triple

T6343862
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Unicode Hebrew block E142695 entity
Predicate containsCombiningMarks P16120 FINISHED
Object Hebrew vowel points LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hebrew vowel points | Statement: [Unicode Hebrew block, containsCombiningMarks, Hebrew vowel points]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsCombiningMarks
Context triple: [Unicode Hebrew block, containsCombiningMarks, Hebrew vowel points]
  • A. hasCombiningMarks chosen
    Indicates that an entity (such as a character or string) includes one or more combining marks attached to a base element.
  • B. hasCanonicalCombiningClassMarks
    Indicates that an entity has associated marks whose Unicode canonical combining class is explicitly defined or recognized.
  • C. hasUnicode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, represented by, or encoded using a specific Unicode character or sequence.
  • D. hasConsonantSigns
    Indicates that one entity possesses or includes consonant sign characters as part of its representation or structure.
  • E. hasBlockUnicode
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a specific Unicode block related to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008d5ab108190b346c465696824a9 completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0674702d08190806ef0998960b797 completed March 22, 2026, 10:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c060ea1a988190889e47b7e0c819b8 completed March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:31 p.m.