Triple

T6321305
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Flags of Ecuador E141743 entity
Predicate provincialFlagsDesignBasis P70038 FINISHED
Object Ecuadorian tricolor or local symbols LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ecuadorian tricolor or local symbols | Statement: [Flags of Ecuador, provincialFlagsDesignBasis, Ecuadorian tricolor or local symbols]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: provincialFlagsDesignBasis
Context triple: [Flags of Ecuador, provincialFlagsDesignBasis, Ecuadorian tricolor or local symbols]
  • A. civilFlagDesign
    Indicates the design or pattern used on the civil (non-state) version of a flag.
  • B. subnationalFlagOf
    Indicates that one flag represents or is officially used by a subnational entity (such as a state, province, or region) within a larger sovereign country.
  • C. flagDesigner
    Indicates that one entity is the person or group responsible for designing the flag associated with another entity.
  • D. nationalFlag
    Indicates that one entity is the official national flag representing the other entity (a country or nation).
  • E. coatOfArmsOnFlag
    Indicates that a flag features or displays a particular coat of arms as part of its design.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008d13b8c8190be47d896eb735605 completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c064c61f008190b316b9ff1023b057 completed March 22, 2026, 9:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c060e5efc48190861b8266e5b0cc0c completed March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c0623bb29081908bfdfb84a07ece90 completed March 22, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:29 p.m.