Triple
T6307339
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Venturia inaequalis |
E141409
|
entity |
| Predicate | primaryInoculum |
P32817
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ascospores |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ascospores | Statement: [Venturia inaequalis, primaryInoculum, ascospores]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryInoculum Context triple: [Venturia inaequalis, primaryInoculum, ascospores]
-
A.
primaryInfectionStructure
chosen
Indicates the structure that serves as the main or initial means by which an infection is established in a host.
-
B.
primaryTropism
Indicates the main directional growth or movement response of an organism or part of an organism to a specific external stimulus.
-
C.
primaryFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the main or principal option, resource, or association for another entity among possible alternatives.
-
D.
primaryThreat
Indicates that one entity is the main or most significant source of danger, harm, or risk to another entity.
-
E.
primaryPigment
Indicates that one pigment is the main or dominant colorant used or present in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008d00efc8190a36c05b4b4a3bf4b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0647b69f08190bb085f9b700f6453 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c060e311b48190b1c74a5cf9435623 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:28 p.m.