Triple

T6304711
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Malaka Regency E141344 entity
Predicate hasLocalDeputyExecutive P40999 FINISHED
Object vice regent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: vice regent | Statement: [Malaka Regency, hasLocalDeputyExecutive, vice regent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLocalDeputyExecutive
Context triple: [Malaka Regency, hasLocalDeputyExecutive, vice regent]
  • A. deputyOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the subordinate or second-in-command to another, acting with delegated authority on their behalf.
  • B. mayHaveDeputy
    Indicates that an entity is allowed or entitled to have another entity serving as its deputy or subordinate representative.
  • C. hasDeputeLeader chosen
    Indicates that an entity serves as the deputy leader (second-in-command) of another entity.
  • D. hasDeputyLeaderTitle
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific title associated with the role of deputy leader.
  • E. deputyMinister
    Indicates that one entity serves as the deputy minister (second-in-command or subordinate minister) to another entity within a governmental or ministerial hierarchy.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008cf0ad4819095def81e2bd42f9f completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0645f26a881909d5746151c0843cc completed March 22, 2026, 9:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c060e311b48190b1c74a5cf9435623 completed March 22, 2026, 9:36 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:28 p.m.