Triple
T6282301
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lie ring |
E140808
|
entity |
| Predicate | alternatingImplies |
P1661
|
FINISHED |
| Object | [x,x]=0 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: [x,x]=0 | Statement: [Lie ring, alternatingImplies, [x,x]=0]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alternatingImplies Context triple: [Lie ring, alternatingImplies, [x,x]=0]
-
A.
implies
chosen
Indicates that the truth of one statement guarantees or leads logically to the truth of another statement.
-
B.
isAlternativeTo
Indicates that one entity can serve as a substitute or different option in place of another.
-
C.
impliedRight
Indicates that one party holds a right or entitlement that is not explicitly stated but is inferred from context, agreements, or established norms.
-
D.
doesNotImply
Indicates that the truth of one statement or condition does not guarantee or lead to the truth of another statement or condition.
-
E.
axiom2
Indicates that the relationship or action is taken as a fundamental, assumed truth within the system, serving as a base rule from which other statements are derived.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008cd17c8819082b82d3fbeb68047 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c063f956c08190ae0f198ccbd68b42 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c05608a5608190b22a1fdc4060470d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:26 p.m.