Triple

T6264903
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. E140389 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation E140389 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation | Statement: [United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., fullName, United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation
Context triple: [United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., fullName, United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation]
  • A. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. chosen
    United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
  • B. United States v. Kagama
    United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
  • C. INS v. Chadha
    INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
  • D. Katzenbach v. Morgan
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • E. Trop v. Dulles
    Trop v. Dulles is a 1958 U.S. Supreme Court case that redefined the scope of the Eighth Amendment by holding that denationalization as punishment is unconstitutional and introducing the concept of “evolving standards of decency” in interpreting cruel and unusual punishment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008cabc4081909723e2547c9d6cc0 completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c0639e64588190875e4e1e772fb336 completed March 22, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c51932e704819083e1ed17a86f6b5e completed March 26, 2026, 11:32 a.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:25 p.m.