Triple
T6264686
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California Labor Code § 2805 |
E140383
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageDiscussedIn |
P69046
|
FINISHED |
| Object | opinion of Justice William J. Brennan Jr. in De Canas v. Bica |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: opinion of Justice William J. Brennan Jr. in De Canas v. Bica | Statement: [California Labor Code § 2805, languageDiscussedIn, opinion of Justice William J. Brennan Jr. in De Canas v. Bica]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageDiscussedIn Context triple: [California Labor Code § 2805, languageDiscussedIn, opinion of Justice William J. Brennan Jr. in De Canas v. Bica]
-
A.
languagesSpoken
Indicates that an entity is able to communicate using one or more specified languages.
-
B.
languageUsedAs
Indicates that one language is employed in a specific role, function, or context relative to another entity or situation.
-
C.
languageUse
Indicates the language or languages an entity uses for communication, expression, or interaction.
-
D.
languageLabel
Indicates the human-readable name or label of a language associated with an entity or resource.
-
E.
languageSpecifies
Indicates that one entity defines or constrains the syntax, semantics, or usage rules that govern how another language or linguistic system is expressed or interpreted.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008cabc4081909723e2547c9d6cc0 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0638c43808190a375e9f29f2b2138 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c05606fb50819082d1a5a91e5030b6 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c056c965ac8190b938502fa8c74e1b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:25 p.m.