Triple
T6264021
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Das Gupta |
E140367
|
entity |
| Predicate | isCompoundSurname |
P69803
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Das Gupta, isCompoundSurname, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isCompoundSurname Context triple: [Das Gupta, isCompoundSurname, true]
-
A.
hasComponentSurname
Indicates that an entity’s full name includes a specified surname as one of its component parts.
-
B.
isCountableAsSurname
Indicates that something can be considered or treated as a valid surname for counting or classification purposes.
-
C.
hasBaseSurname
Indicates that an entity’s surname is derived from, or fundamentally corresponds to, a specified base or canonical surname.
-
D.
isPatronymicSurname
Indicates that a surname is derived from the given name of a father or male ancestor, typically signifying "son/daughter of" that person.
-
E.
isMatronymicOf
Indicates that one entity is a name or designation derived from the mother of another entity, typically used as that entity’s family or identifying name.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008c95c5c819084bd3dd56133d84d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0638c43808190a375e9f29f2b2138 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c05605566c81908e197f5accd072d2 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c05707d5408190a1d0fd80414ad957 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:25 p.m.