Triple
T6255230
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Evans County |
E140145
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bryan County |
E97739
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bryan County | Statement: [Evans County, borders, Bryan County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bryan County Context triple: [Evans County, borders, Bryan County]
-
A.
Bryan County
chosen
Bryan County is a coastal county in southeastern Georgia known for its proximity to Savannah and a mix of rural communities and growing suburban areas.
-
B.
Choctaw County
Choctaw County is a rural county in southwestern Alabama known for its pine forests, timber industry, and small, close-knit communities.
-
C.
Wilkinson County
Wilkinson County is a county in central Georgia, United States, known for its rural character and early 19th-century origins.
-
D.
McIntosh County
McIntosh County is a coastal county in southeastern Georgia known for its marshlands, historic communities, and location along the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway.
-
E.
Jones County
Jones County is a rural county in the U.S. state of Texas, known for its agricultural economy and small communities near the Abilene region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008b4858c819095b0199114a9a87b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c06363d6008190bf05e003b1f74497 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c6537daf648190b40329e2a5934c09 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 9:53 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:24 p.m.