Triple
T6250623
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kelo v. City of New London |
E140035
|
entity |
| Predicate | clarifiedThat |
P56163
|
FINISHED |
| Object | public use includes public purpose |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: public use includes public purpose | Statement: [Kelo v. City of New London, clarifiedThat, public use includes public purpose]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: clarifiedThat Context triple: [Kelo v. City of New London, clarifiedThat, public use includes public purpose]
-
A.
clarifiesThat
chosen
Indicates that one entity explains or makes another entity more understandable by removing ambiguity or confusion about it.
-
B.
clarifiesStandard
Indicates that one entity explains, specifies, or makes more precise the meaning or application of a given standard for another entity.
-
C.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
-
D.
announcedThat
Indicates that one entity publicly communicated or declared a specific fact, decision, or piece of information about another entity or situation.
-
E.
concludedThat
Indicates that one entity has reached or stated a judgment, inference, or decision about a proposition or situation involving another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008b4858c819095b0199114a9a87b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0633dde348190bbf02a943d94e3be |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c056037bf88190a0a3fe7429345d0b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:24 p.m.