Triple
T6244298
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Long John Silver |
E139678
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipTypeWith Jim Hawkins |
P38921
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mentor-like yet adversarial |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mentor-like yet adversarial | Statement: [Long John Silver, relationshipTypeWith Jim Hawkins, mentor-like yet adversarial]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWith Jim Hawkins Context triple: [Long John Silver, relationshipTypeWith Jim Hawkins, mentor-like yet adversarial]
-
A.
relationshipToHuckFinn
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has to Huck Finn.
-
B.
relationshipToHuck
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship that one entity has with Huck.
-
C.
relationshipToAhab
Indicates the specific type of personal or social connection an entity has with Ahab.
-
D.
relationshipToCharacter
chosen
Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or narrative connection that one entity has to a given character.
-
E.
characterActorRelationship
Indicates a relationship where an actor portrays or is associated with a specific character in a work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008b1c5088190ae6de2555fc05ad8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0631c63d48190a41ec1232aecb373 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c056037bf88190a0a3fe7429345d0b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:23 p.m.