Triple

T623926
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Vivian "Buster" Burey Marshall E14572 entity
Predicate connectedToCaseHistory P16345 FINISHED
Object Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall) E1208 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall) | Statement: [Vivian "Buster" Burey Marshall, connectedToCaseHistory, Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall)
Context triple: [Vivian "Buster" Burey Marshall, connectedToCaseHistory, Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall)]
  • A. Brown v. Board of Education chosen
    Brown v. Board of Education is the landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision that declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, overturning the “separate but equal” doctrine.
  • B. Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
    Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County was a landmark civil rights case challenging racial segregation in Virginia’s public schools that became one of the five cases consolidated into the U.S. Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision.
  • C. Sweatt v. Painter
    Sweatt v. Painter was a landmark 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged racial segregation in higher education and helped lay the groundwork for Brown v. Board of Education.
  • D. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
    Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the doctrine of disparate impact in employment discrimination law, holding that seemingly neutral job requirements that disproportionately exclude protected groups can violate Title VII.
  • E. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
    The Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas was the school district authority that served as a central defendant in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court desegregation cases following Brown v. Board of Education.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectedToCaseHistory
Context triple: [Vivian "Buster" Burey Marshall, connectedToCaseHistory, Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall)]
  • A. relatedCase
    Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
  • B. historicalContactWith
    Indicates that two entities have interacted or been in communication with each other at some point in the past.
  • C. subsequentHistory
    Indicates that one event, state, or record occurs or is recorded after another in time, reflecting its later historical development or outcome.
  • D. hasPatient
    Indicates that an action, event, or process involves a specific entity as the one undergoing or receiving its effects (the patient).
  • E. historicallyLinked chosen
    Indicates that two entities are connected through a shared or related historical event, period, or development.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4934b17c881909ace8270e8ddd202 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49e41753881909f0faed720cc31bc completed March 1, 2026, 8:14 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a567012e9c81909d502e29fff35750 completed March 2, 2026, 10:31 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49d0069d0819087c83b608f6fc053 completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.