Triple
T623926
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vivian "Buster" Burey Marshall |
E14572
|
entity |
| Predicate | connectedToCaseHistory |
P16345
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall) |
E1208
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall) | Statement: [Vivian "Buster" Burey Marshall, connectedToCaseHistory, Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall) Context triple: [Vivian "Buster" Burey Marshall, connectedToCaseHistory, Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall)]
-
A.
Brown v. Board of Education
chosen
Brown v. Board of Education is the landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision that declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, overturning the “separate but equal” doctrine.
-
B.
Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County was a landmark civil rights case challenging racial segregation in Virginia’s public schools that became one of the five cases consolidated into the U.S. Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision.
-
C.
Sweatt v. Painter
Sweatt v. Painter was a landmark 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged racial segregation in higher education and helped lay the groundwork for Brown v. Board of Education.
-
D.
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the doctrine of disparate impact in employment discrimination law, holding that seemingly neutral job requirements that disproportionately exclude protected groups can violate Title VII.
-
E.
Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
The Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas was the school district authority that served as a central defendant in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court desegregation cases following Brown v. Board of Education.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectedToCaseHistory Context triple: [Vivian "Buster" Burey Marshall, connectedToCaseHistory, Brown v. Board of Education (indirectly through support of Thurgood Marshall)]
-
A.
relatedCase
Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
-
B.
historicalContactWith
Indicates that two entities have interacted or been in communication with each other at some point in the past.
-
C.
subsequentHistory
Indicates that one event, state, or record occurs or is recorded after another in time, reflecting its later historical development or outcome.
-
D.
hasPatient
Indicates that an action, event, or process involves a specific entity as the one undergoing or receiving its effects (the patient).
-
E.
historicallyLinked
chosen
Indicates that two entities are connected through a shared or related historical event, period, or development.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4934b17c881909ace8270e8ddd202 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49e41753881909f0faed720cc31bc |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:14 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a567012e9c81909d502e29fff35750 |
completed | March 2, 2026, 10:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49d0069d0819087c83b608f6fc053 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.