Triple

T6233033
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cockcroft–Walton experiment E139400 entity
Predicate reactionEquation P65744 FINISHED
Object p + ⁷Li → 2 ⁴He LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: p + ⁷Li → 2 ⁴He | Statement: [Cockcroft–Walton experiment, reactionEquation, p + ⁷Li → 2 ⁴He]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reactionEquation
Context triple: [Cockcroft–Walton experiment, reactionEquation, p + ⁷Li → 2 ⁴He]
  • A. fusionReactionExample chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as an example or instance of a specific fusion reaction involving the other entity.
  • B. keyChemicalDiscussed
    Indicates that a particular chemical substance is a central topic of discussion in a given context or communication.
  • C. fusionReactionType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of nuclear fusion process that relates two or more participating entities.
  • D. hasChemicalFormula
    Indicates that one entity (typically a chemical substance) is characterized by or associated with a specific chemical formula representing its elemental composition.
  • E. chemicallyRelatedTo
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected through a chemical association, such as sharing structural features, participating in related reactions, or being derivable from one another chemically.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008b0e7ac8190808a59573ee646f3 completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c062efa25c8190a54f5a6f5b5ad24f completed March 22, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c05601de6481909d0880048fd7b49a completed March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:22 p.m.