Triple
T6229447
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Standard Tongan |
E139317
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | variety of Tongan language |
C19453
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: variety of Tongan language Context triple: [Standard Tongan, instanceOf, variety of Tongan language]
-
A.
variety of Fang language
A variety of Fang language is a specific regional or social form of the Fang language distinguished by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other Fang forms.
-
B.
variety of Tajik language
A variety of Tajik language is a regional or social form of Tajik distinguished by specific phonological, lexical, and grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms of Tajik.
-
C.
variety of Swahili
A variety of Swahili is a distinct form of the Swahili language characterized by specific regional, social, or functional linguistic features in its phonology, grammar, and vocabulary.
-
D.
Yana language variety
Yana language variety refers to any of the related but distinct forms of the Yana language traditionally spoken by the Yana people of northern California, encompassing dialectal differences in phonology, vocabulary, and grammar.
-
E.
variety of Belarusian language
A variety of the Belarusian language is a regionally or socially distinct form of Belarusian characterized by specific phonological, lexical, and grammatical features within the broader Belarusian linguistic system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008afd3148190b71e9eaa60420dd1 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:22 p.m.