Triple
T6229209
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alliance for Financial Inclusion |
E139310
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasWorkingGroup |
P1382
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Global Standards Proportionality Working Group
The Global Standards Proportionality Working Group is a specialized body within the Alliance for Financial Inclusion that focuses on implementing and promoting proportionate application of global financial regulatory standards to support financial inclusion.
|
E578385
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Global Standards Proportionality Working Group | Statement: [Alliance for Financial Inclusion, hasWorkingGroup, Global Standards Proportionality Working Group]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Global Standards Proportionality Working Group Context triple: [Alliance for Financial Inclusion, hasWorkingGroup, Global Standards Proportionality Working Group]
-
A.
Unilateral Conduct Working Group
The Unilateral Conduct Working Group is a specialized body within the International Competition Network that develops best practices and guidance on how competition authorities should assess and address potentially anticompetitive unilateral behavior by dominant firms.
-
B.
Working Group on Evaluations and Compliance
The Working Group on Evaluations and Compliance is a specialized body within the Financial Action Task Force responsible for assessing countries’ adherence to global anti–money laundering and counter-terrorist financing standards.
-
C.
The Hague Working Group
The Hague Working Group is a subsidiary body of the International Criminal Court’s Assembly of States Parties that conducts detailed, ongoing negotiations and consultations on the Court’s governance, budget, and policy issues.
-
D.
Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group on the Review of Implementation of the Convention
The Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group on the Review of Implementation of the Convention is a subsidiary body under the Convention on Biological Diversity tasked with assessing and improving how parties implement the treaty’s provisions and commitments.
-
E.
Working Party on Domestic Regulation
The Working Party on Domestic Regulation is a specialized body within the World Trade Organization that focuses on developing and clarifying rules governing domestic regulatory measures affecting trade in services.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Global Standards Proportionality Working Group Triple: [Alliance for Financial Inclusion, hasWorkingGroup, Global Standards Proportionality Working Group]
Generated description
The Global Standards Proportionality Working Group is a specialized body within the Alliance for Financial Inclusion that focuses on implementing and promoting proportionate application of global financial regulatory standards to support financial inclusion.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Global Standards Proportionality Working Group Target entity description: The Global Standards Proportionality Working Group is a specialized body within the Alliance for Financial Inclusion that focuses on implementing and promoting proportionate application of global financial regulatory standards to support financial inclusion.
-
A.
Unilateral Conduct Working Group
The Unilateral Conduct Working Group is a specialized body within the International Competition Network that develops best practices and guidance on how competition authorities should assess and address potentially anticompetitive unilateral behavior by dominant firms.
-
B.
Working Group on Evaluations and Compliance
The Working Group on Evaluations and Compliance is a specialized body within the Financial Action Task Force responsible for assessing countries’ adherence to global anti–money laundering and counter-terrorist financing standards.
-
C.
The Hague Working Group
The Hague Working Group is a subsidiary body of the International Criminal Court’s Assembly of States Parties that conducts detailed, ongoing negotiations and consultations on the Court’s governance, budget, and policy issues.
-
D.
Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group on the Review of Implementation of the Convention
The Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group on the Review of Implementation of the Convention is a subsidiary body under the Convention on Biological Diversity tasked with assessing and improving how parties implement the treaty’s provisions and commitments.
-
E.
Working Party on Domestic Regulation
The Working Party on Domestic Regulation is a specialized body within the World Trade Organization that focuses on developing and clarifying rules governing domestic regulatory measures affecting trade in services.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008afd3148190b71e9eaa60420dd1 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c062d841a88190b67a8045cdaadf44 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c20de16d988190acdec1deba75e06e |
completed | March 24, 2026, 4:06 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69c2141927288190bad4ec024997a45e |
completed | March 24, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69c214d7f2d08190bd6dab4da08c97dc |
completed | March 24, 2026, 4:36 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:22 p.m.