Triple

T6224994
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject opinion in Atkins v. Virginia E139206 entity
Predicate remand P12548 FINISHED
Object case remanded to Virginia courts for further proceedings LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: case remanded to Virginia courts for further proceedings | Statement: [opinion in Atkins v. Virginia, remand, case remanded to Virginia courts for further proceedings]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: remand
Context triple: [opinion in Atkins v. Virginia, remand, case remanded to Virginia courts for further proceedings]
  • A. canRemand chosen
    Indicates that an authority (such as a court or decision-maker) has the power to send a case or matter back to a lower body or earlier stage for further action or reconsideration.
  • B. reargued
    Indicates that an argument, case, or issue was presented and debated again, typically after having been argued previously.
  • C. remedy
    Indicates that one entity serves to cure, alleviate, or counteract a problem, illness, or undesirable condition affecting another entity.
  • D. recommissioned
    Indicates that something previously deactivated, retired, or out of service has been restored and formally returned to active use or operation.
  • E. appeal
    Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008afd3148190b71e9eaa60420dd1 completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c062d42c688190be4d8d8325d6daaa completed March 22, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c055ffdf54819086d987d646e44ff5 completed March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:22 p.m.