Triple
T6223295
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William G. Morgan |
E139167
|
entity |
| Predicate | reasonForInvention |
P5256
|
FINISHED |
| Object | to create a less strenuous indoor game than basketball |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: to create a less strenuous indoor game than basketball | Statement: [William G. Morgan, reasonForInvention, to create a less strenuous indoor game than basketball]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasonForInvention Context triple: [William G. Morgan, reasonForInvention, to create a less strenuous indoor game than basketball]
-
A.
invention
Indicates that one entity is the creator or originator of another entity, typically a device, method, or idea.
-
B.
reasonForCreation
chosen
Indicates that one entity was created for the purpose, cause, or motivation specified by another entity.
-
C.
reasonForDesign
Indicates that one entity serves as the explanation, motivation, or justification for why another entity was designed or created in a particular way.
-
D.
inventionType
Indicates the specific category or kind of invention that characterizes the relationship between an invention and its type.
-
E.
wasInventedBy
Indicates that something (typically an object, concept, or process) was created or brought into existence by a particular inventor or originator.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008aecb0c81909984b48f733ce8ae |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c062c06c7881909999ba44aa4a23f9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055ffdf54819086d987d646e44ff5 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:22 p.m.