Triple

T6220558
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject South Division E139100 entity
Predicate alignmentCriterion P26112 FINISHED
Object institutional geography LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: institutional geography | Statement: [South Division, alignmentCriterion, institutional geography]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alignmentCriterion
Context triple: [South Division, alignmentCriterion, institutional geography]
  • A. alignmentConcept
    Indicates a conceptual or abstract relationship of alignment or correspondence between entities, such as agreement, compatibility, or shared orientation in some dimension.
  • B. alignedAgainst
    Indicates that two or more entities are united in opposition to a common target, side, or objective.
  • C. basedOnAlignmentOf
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is determined, derived, or decided according to how closely it aligns with another entity’s position, orientation, or criteria.
  • D. selectionMetric chosen
    Indicates the criterion or measure used to evaluate and choose among alternative options or candidates.
  • E. alignmentWithMoreau
    Indicates a relationship where an entity’s views, actions, or characteristics are in agreement or ideological conformity with those associated with Moreau.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008aecb0c81909984b48f733ce8ae completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c062bcc2348190806ed8c98bdfbf3e completed March 22, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c055ffdf54819086d987d646e44ff5 completed March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:21 p.m.