Triple
T621058
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Employment Division v. Smith |
E14513
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFullCitation |
P17212
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) |
E14513
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) | Statement: [Employment Division v. Smith, hasFullCitation, Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) Context triple: [Employment Division v. Smith, hasFullCitation, Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)]
-
A.
Employment Division v. Smith
chosen
Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
-
B.
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the doctrine of disparate impact in employment discrimination law, holding that seemingly neutral job requirements that disproportionately exclude protected groups can violate Title VII.
-
C.
South Dakota v. Dole
South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
-
D.
Lee v. Weisman
Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
E.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFullCitation Context triple: [Employment Division v. Smith, hasFullCitation, Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)]
-
A.
hasCitationImpact
Indicates that one entity (such as a publication, author, or venue) exerts measurable influence on scholarly work through citations it receives or generates.
-
B.
stillCitedFor
Indicates that a work or source continues to be referenced or relied upon as a citation after its original publication or use.
-
C.
citationNumber
Indicates the specific numeric identifier assigned to a citation within a document or reference list.
-
D.
citationBy
Indicates that one work is cited or referenced by another work.
-
E.
originalCitationForm
Indicates the relationship where one form of a cited work is the initial or primary version from which other citation forms or variants are derived.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4934b17c881909ace8270e8ddd202 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49e3e5d80819096e72e11b533f931 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:14 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69a563c682f88190a2af1087246be4c4 |
completed | March 2, 2026, 10:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49cfe9bc081909a01b4b3b48f03b7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a49defe58c8190bd39ef47c9f660a7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.