Triple

T621058
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Employment Division v. Smith E14513 entity
Predicate hasFullCitation P17212 FINISHED
Object Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) E14513 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) | Statement: [Employment Division v. Smith, hasFullCitation, Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)
Context triple: [Employment Division v. Smith, hasFullCitation, Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)]
  • A. Employment Division v. Smith chosen
    Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
  • B. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
    Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the doctrine of disparate impact in employment discrimination law, holding that seemingly neutral job requirements that disproportionately exclude protected groups can violate Title VII.
  • C. South Dakota v. Dole
    South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
  • D. Lee v. Weisman
    Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
  • E. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
    McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFullCitation
Context triple: [Employment Division v. Smith, hasFullCitation, Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)]
  • A. hasCitationImpact
    Indicates that one entity (such as a publication, author, or venue) exerts measurable influence on scholarly work through citations it receives or generates.
  • B. stillCitedFor
    Indicates that a work or source continues to be referenced or relied upon as a citation after its original publication or use.
  • C. citationNumber
    Indicates the specific numeric identifier assigned to a citation within a document or reference list.
  • D. citationBy
    Indicates that one work is cited or referenced by another work.
  • E. originalCitationForm
    Indicates the relationship where one form of a cited work is the initial or primary version from which other citation forms or variants are derived.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4934b17c881909ace8270e8ddd202 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a49e3e5d80819096e72e11b533f931 completed March 1, 2026, 8:14 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a563c682f88190a2af1087246be4c4 completed March 2, 2026, 10:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a49cfe9bc081909a01b4b3b48f03b7 completed March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a49defe58c8190bd39ef47c9f660a7 completed March 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.