Triple

T6207164
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject San Joaquin River Conservancy E138776 entity
Predicate hasBoardComposition P68913 FINISHED
Object state representatives LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state representatives | Statement: [San Joaquin River Conservancy, hasBoardComposition, state representatives]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBoardComposition
Context triple: [San Joaquin River Conservancy, hasBoardComposition, state representatives]
  • A. hasBoardSize
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a board whose dimensions or overall size are specified.
  • B. hasLocalBoards
    Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more governing or administrative boards operating at a local or regional level.
  • C. hasCompanionPiece
    Indicates that one item is conceptually or functionally paired with another item as its companion piece.
  • D. board
    Indicates that an agent gets onto or into a vehicle, vessel, or craft in order to travel or be transported.
  • E. hasSetPiece
    Indicates that an event, scene, or work includes a distinct, often elaborate set piece as a notable component.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008acbea48190991c6b834bb45d65 completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c06270b8d08190a81bc03c8175b989 completed March 22, 2026, 9:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c055fdea3c81908f5d910f0d36234a completed March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c056c965ac8190b938502fa8c74e1b completed March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:20 p.m.