Triple
T6196424
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Faculty of Law, University of Neuchâtel |
E138518
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesLegalSystemContext |
P65627
|
FINISHED |
| Object | civil law tradition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: civil law tradition | Statement: [Faculty of Law, University of Neuchâtel, usesLegalSystemContext, civil law tradition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesLegalSystemContext Context triple: [Faculty of Law, University of Neuchâtel, usesLegalSystemContext, civil law tradition]
-
A.
legalSystemWorkedIn
Indicates that a person carried out their professional legal activities within a particular legal system or jurisdiction.
-
B.
relatedLegalSystem
Indicates that there is an association or connection between two legal systems, such as influence, similarity, shared origin, or mutual relevance.
-
C.
hasLegalSystemType
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or is governed by a particular type or form of legal system.
-
D.
legalSystemWorkedOn
Indicates that a legal system has been applied to, influenced, or modified by some agent or process.
-
E.
legalSystemFeature
Indicates a characteristic, rule, or structural element that forms part of a particular legal system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008ab9b3081908a11b2c744838435 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c062508f5c8190a00291708a9a7de9 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055fbce1081908805fd12e242ab96 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:20 p.m.