Triple
T6175159
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Asellus Australis |
E137798
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasExoplanetsDetected |
P69241
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no confirmed exoplanets |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no confirmed exoplanets | Statement: [Asellus Australis, hasExoplanetsDetected, no confirmed exoplanets]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasExoplanetsDetected Context triple: [Asellus Australis, hasExoplanetsDetected, no confirmed exoplanets]
-
A.
hasCandidateExoplanets
Indicates that an astronomical object or system is associated with one or more potential exoplanets that meet specified candidacy criteria.
-
B.
hasPlanet
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a particular planet as part of its system or domain.
-
C.
hasCandidatePlanet
Indicates that an object (typically a star or system) is associated with a planet that is suspected or proposed to exist but not yet fully confirmed.
-
D.
isExoplanetSearchTarget
Indicates that an astronomical object has been identified as a suitable target for searching for exoplanets.
-
E.
numberOfStarsWithPlanets
Indicates the count of stars that have one or more planets associated with them.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a80f748190ba3d07ffc81acb29 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05dc55b5c819084482b735771c9a8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055f7f12881908e21c04e9b752ba4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c056df95ac8190bc5efe050d3af864 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:18 p.m.