Triple
T6174961
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Canis Minor |
E137794
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionalAsterism |
P20405
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Procyon and Gomeisa forming the dog |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Procyon and Gomeisa forming the dog | Statement: [Canis Minor, traditionalAsterism, Procyon and Gomeisa forming the dog]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalAsterism Context triple: [Canis Minor, traditionalAsterism, Procyon and Gomeisa forming the dog]
-
A.
isAsterismOf
chosen
Indicates that one or more stars collectively form or belong to a specific asterism.
-
B.
containsAsterism
Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses an asterism (a recognizable pattern or grouping of stars) within its extent or definition.
-
C.
constellationType
Indicates that one entity is classified as a specific type or category of constellation in relation to another entity.
-
D.
constellationFamily
Indicates that one constellation belongs to the same traditional family or grouping of constellations as another.
-
E.
traditionalMotif
Indicates that something incorporates, represents, or is characterized by a motif rooted in established cultural or historical traditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a80f748190ba3d07ffc81acb29 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05dc55b5c819084482b735771c9a8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055f7f12881908e21c04e9b752ba4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:18 p.m.