Triple

T6171483
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Does Not Suffice E137707 entity
Predicate hasMusicalArrangement P40362 FINISHED
Object intimate piano arrangement LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intimate piano arrangement | Statement: [Does Not Suffice, hasMusicalArrangement, intimate piano arrangement]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMusicalArrangement
Context triple: [Does Not Suffice, hasMusicalArrangement, intimate piano arrangement]
  • A. hasMusical
    Indicates that one entity features, includes, or is associated with a musical work, performance, or musical component.
  • B. hasPianoArrangement chosen
    Indicates that one entity has a version or adaptation of it arranged specifically for piano.
  • C. hasArranger
    Indicates that one entity serves as the arranger (e.g., musically or structurally) for another entity, such as a work, performance, or composition.
  • D. hasMusicalForm
    Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or piece) is characterized by or structured according to a particular musical form.
  • E. hasMusicalSettingsBy
    Indicates that a work has been set to music or musically arranged by a specified creator or composer.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008a68c508190a8d78245c865960e completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c05d910c3c8190ae6af548259295ff completed March 22, 2026, 9:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c055f7f12881908e21c04e9b752ba4 completed March 22, 2026, 8:50 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:18 p.m.