Triple

T6165892
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Barron v. Baltimore E137556 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago E137555 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago | Statement: [Barron v. Baltimore, relatedCase, Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago
Context triple: [Barron v. Baltimore, relatedCase, Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago]
  • A. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago chosen
    Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago is an 1897 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a key step in applying federal constitutional protections—particularly just compensation for takings—to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • B. Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
    Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. is a 1916 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal income tax and clarified the scope and constitutionality of the Sixteenth Amendment.
  • C. Railway Express Agency v. New York
    Railway Express Agency v. New York is a 1949 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a New York City traffic regulation restricting advertising on vehicles against an Equal Protection Clause challenge.
  • D. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
    California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the limits of First Amendment petitioning rights when parties allegedly use governmental and judicial processes as part of an anticompetitive scheme in violation of antitrust laws.
  • E. United States v. E. C. Knight Co.
    United States v. E. C. Knight Co. was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court decision that sharply limited the federal government’s power to regulate monopolies under the Commerce Clause, weakening early enforcement of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008a54fc88190b6ce4416490ca79d completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c05d6225bc819097707be620681e7b completed March 22, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c20d7783988190a0f0c8b37abe7069 completed March 24, 2026, 4:05 a.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:17 p.m.