Triple

T6165859
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago E137555 entity
Predicate alsoKnownAs P39 FINISHED
Object CB&Q v. Chicago E137555 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CB&Q v. Chicago | Statement: [Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago, alsoKnownAs, CB&Q v. Chicago]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: CB&Q v. Chicago
Context triple: [Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago, alsoKnownAs, CB&Q v. Chicago]
  • A. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago chosen
    Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. Chicago is an 1897 U.S. Supreme Court case that marked a key step in applying federal constitutional protections—particularly just compensation for takings—to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • B. Railway Express Agency v. New York
    Railway Express Agency v. New York is a 1949 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a New York City traffic regulation restricting advertising on vehicles against an Equal Protection Clause challenge.
  • C. Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
    Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. is a 1916 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal income tax and clarified the scope and constitutionality of the Sixteenth Amendment.
  • D. McDonald v. City of Chicago
    McDonald v. City of Chicago is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms applies to state and local governments through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • E. United States v. Darby
    United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c008a54fc88190b6ce4416490ca79d completed March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c05d6225bc819097707be620681e7b completed March 22, 2026, 9:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c16ee26ed8819084a5cfd84ba9564e completed March 23, 2026, 4:48 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:17 p.m.