Triple
T6162361
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amelia Brand |
E137470
|
entity |
| Predicate | initiallySupportsPlan |
P69133
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Plan A gravity solution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Plan A gravity solution | Statement: [Amelia Brand, initiallySupportsPlan, Plan A gravity solution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: initiallySupportsPlan Context triple: [Amelia Brand, initiallySupportsPlan, Plan A gravity solution]
-
A.
hasPlan
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific plan or course of action.
-
B.
hasBasePlan
Indicates that an entity is associated with or derived from a specified foundational or default plan.
-
C.
previouslySupported
Indicates that an entity provided support to another entity at some time in the past, but not necessarily in the present.
-
D.
supportedIn
Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
-
E.
isSupportedBy
Indicates that an entity is upheld, sustained, or enabled by another entity, which provides necessary assistance, resources, or justification.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a54fc88190b6ce4416490ca79d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05d371484819090c18b62b095b49e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055f5b81481908819515cdc334ae6 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c056df95ac8190bc5efe050d3af864 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:17 p.m.