Triple
T6162360
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amelia Brand |
E137470
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsPlan |
P1086
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Plan B colonization strategy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Plan B colonization strategy | Statement: [Amelia Brand, supportsPlan, Plan B colonization strategy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsPlan Context triple: [Amelia Brand, supportsPlan, Plan B colonization strategy]
-
A.
supportsProduct
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, compatibility, or necessary resources for the operation, use, or maintenance of a specified product.
-
B.
supportedIn
Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
-
C.
supportsProject
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or endorsement to help another entity’s project succeed.
-
D.
supportsPolicy
chosen
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
-
E.
hasPlan
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific plan or course of action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a54fc88190b6ce4416490ca79d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05d371484819090c18b62b095b49e |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055f5b81481908819515cdc334ae6 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:17 p.m.