Triple
T6158252
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Staszów County |
E137376
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsAdministrativeTerritorialEntity |
P747
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Połaniec |
E692648
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Połaniec | Statement: [Staszów County, containsAdministrativeTerritorialEntity, Połaniec]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Połaniec Context triple: [Staszów County, containsAdministrativeTerritorialEntity, Połaniec]
-
A.
Pałuki
Pałuki is a historical and ethnographic region in north-central Poland, known for its distinctive folk culture, wooden architecture, and numerous lakes.
-
B.
Goleniów
Goleniów is a town in northwestern Poland that serves as a local transport hub and gateway to the nearby regional capital Szczecin.
-
C.
Łęczna
Łęczna is a town in eastern Poland known for its location near the Lublin Coal Basin and as a local administrative and service center.
-
D.
Oleśnica
chosen
Oleśnica is a village located in Busko County in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship of south-central Poland.
-
E.
Oleśnica
Oleśnica is a historic town in southwestern Poland known for its Renaissance castle and well-preserved old town.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a45d008190832a9e19f5d63406 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05d32ef548190bc215d052d3497fe |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69cef26fd12c819082f644bc727584ec |
completed | April 2, 2026, 10:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:17 p.m.