Triple
T6153364
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Major General (Royal Norwegian Air Force) |
E137258
|
entity |
| Predicate | genderNeutral |
P37803
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Major General (Royal Norwegian Air Force), genderNeutral, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: genderNeutral Context triple: [Major General (Royal Norwegian Air Force), genderNeutral, yes]
-
A.
hasGenderNeutrality
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a term, form, or expression) is neutral with respect to gender and does not specify or imply any particular gender.
-
B.
genderNeutralForm
Indicates that one entity is a gender-neutral linguistic form or expression corresponding to another, more gendered form.
-
C.
hasNeutralPronoun
Indicates that an entity is referred to using a gender-neutral pronoun.
-
D.
genderSignificance
Indicates the relevance or impact that an entity’s gender has within a particular context, relationship, or interpretation.
-
E.
genderUsage
Indicates how a particular gender is applied, referenced, or treated within a given context or system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a45d008190832a9e19f5d63406 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05cffc7bc819092633a9e5f1abe2f |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055f39e0881909ae56444b1b48929 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:16 p.m.