Triple
T6138737
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lancaster Fire Department |
E136903
|
entity |
| Predicate | responsibleForService |
P636
|
FINISHED |
| Object | fire suppression |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fire suppression | Statement: [Lancaster Fire Department, responsibleForService, fire suppression]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: responsibleForService Context triple: [Lancaster Fire Department, responsibleForService, fire suppression]
-
A.
responsibleFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
-
B.
serviceFor
Indicates that one entity provides a service or performs functions on behalf of another entity.
-
C.
servedByService
Indicates that something is provided, handled, or fulfilled by a particular service.
-
D.
usedForService
Indicates that one entity is employed, utilized, or designated to perform, support, or provide a particular service for another entity.
-
E.
providesServices
Indicates that one entity supplies or performs services for the benefit or use of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a179388190a3b5a081bbf46d55 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05c855a2481909801de9fd55686a4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c055f19b0c81908be34a00ab218723 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:15 p.m.