Triple
T6128041
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cold Start Doctrine |
E136640
|
entity |
| Predicate | doctrinalConcept |
P57394
|
FINISHED |
| Object | proactive operations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: proactive operations | Statement: [Cold Start Doctrine, doctrinalConcept, proactive operations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doctrinalConcept Context triple: [Cold Start Doctrine, doctrinalConcept, proactive operations]
-
A.
theologicalConcept
Indicates that something is a religious or theological idea, doctrine, or principle within a belief system.
-
B.
doctrinalSignificance
Indicates the importance or impact that a doctrine or set of teachings has within a particular religious, legal, or ideological system.
-
C.
doctrinalTheme
chosen
Indicates that one entity concerns, expresses, or is characterized by a particular doctrinal or theological theme in relation to another.
-
D.
doctrinalEmphasis
Indicates a relationship where a doctrine, belief system, or teaching is given particular focus, priority, or stress within a religious, ideological, or organizational context.
-
E.
doctrinalConcern
Indicates a relationship where one party has a worry, objection, or issue specifically about the correctness or acceptability of another party’s doctrines or teachings.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008a0a37c81908e5b4f879158afb3 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05c4b1df081908dc87fa1c45a43bf |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049fa905c8190b99eda54e9771b0b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:15 p.m.