Triple
T612448
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Five |
E12127
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPanelFormat |
P17102
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [The Five, hasPanelFormat, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPanelFormat Context triple: [The Five, hasPanelFormat, true]
-
A.
hasExhibitFormat
Indicates the specific format or medium in which an exhibit is presented or made available.
-
B.
hasFileFormat
Indicates that one entity (typically a digital file or resource) is encoded, stored, or represented using a specific file format defined by the other entity.
-
C.
hasPublishingFormat
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific format or medium in which it is published or made publicly available.
-
D.
hasForm
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular shape, structure, or configuration.
-
E.
hasPar
Indicates a relationship where one entity has another entity as its parent.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493309df48190a327f748e88049a6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a49e07739481909930a6577c081b9e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a49cfa7b4481909bec7a5fd3e98c65 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a49def31ec81909dc53e70f4a36eda |
completed | March 1, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:35 p.m.