Triple

T6111279
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wykeham Professor of Physics at the University of Oxford E136244 entity
Predicate holderConducts P68218 FINISHED
Object research in physics LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: research in physics | Statement: [Wykeham Professor of Physics at the University of Oxford, holderConducts, research in physics]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holderConducts
Context triple: [Wykeham Professor of Physics at the University of Oxford, holderConducts, research in physics]
  • A. holderIs
    Indicates that one entity serves as the holder, possessor, or container of another entity.
  • B. holderMayBe
    Indicates that a particular entity is allowed or permitted to serve as the holder or possessor of another entity.
  • C. holderMustBe
    Indicates that a specified entity is required to be the holder or possessor of another entity or resource.
  • D. holdsIn
    Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
  • E. heldAs
    Indicates that one entity is kept, maintained, or regarded in a particular state, role, or condition by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0089ea6f88190b349be53e04b4f5f completed March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c05bbbbea88190b889a7c30af1d71a completed March 22, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c049f80e2081909b7d84a104cda68d completed March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c04e8e3f2c8190be459ca02f9b315a completed March 22, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:13 p.m.