Triple
T6102863
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Count Zaroff |
E136043
|
entity |
| Predicate | personalityArchetype |
P37384
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cultured psychopath |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cultured psychopath | Statement: [Count Zaroff, personalityArchetype, cultured psychopath]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: personalityArchetype Context triple: [Count Zaroff, personalityArchetype, cultured psychopath]
-
A.
personalityType
Indicates the specific psychological or behavioral profile that characterizes an entity’s typical patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting.
-
B.
APACharacteristics
Indicates that one entity specifies or describes the attributes, features, or properties of another entity.
-
C.
associatedCharacterTrait
chosen
Indicates a relationship where a character is linked to, or described by, a particular trait or quality.
-
D.
roleInTheology
Indicates the specific function, position, or significance an entity holds within a theological system, doctrine, or belief framework.
-
E.
typeOfCharacter
Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of character in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0087dee9881909e3655be88208c01 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05b3dbc6c8190b9e3d81e6ca9eeb8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049f5ac988190b62ba565153aaa35 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:13 p.m.