Triple
T6099957
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ruritania |
E135967
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPrimaryConflictType |
P68124
|
FINISHED |
| Object | succession crisis |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: succession crisis | Statement: [Ruritania, hasPrimaryConflictType, succession crisis]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrimaryConflictType Context triple: [Ruritania, hasPrimaryConflictType, succession crisis]
-
A.
hasRelatedConflict
Indicates that one entity is associated with another entity through a related or connected conflict, dispute, or incompatibility.
-
B.
hasConflictStatus
Indicates that there exists a state of conflict or dispute associated with the relationship between the involved entities.
-
C.
hasOngoingConflict
Indicates that there is a current, unresolved state of opposition, dispute, or hostilities between the related entities.
-
D.
usedInConflictType
Indicates that something (such as a resource, method, or capability) is employed or applied within a specific type or category of conflict.
-
E.
appliesToConflictWith
Indicates that one element’s scope, rules, or effects are relevant to a conflict involving another element, defining how that element is implicated in or governed by the conflict.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0087cd3c48190b459848c72d84eb1 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05b3970808190ba90f5e4235db9f2 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049f5ac988190b62ba565153aaa35 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c04e8e3f2c8190be459ca02f9b315a |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:13 p.m.