Triple
T6094964
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saiph |
E135853
|
entity |
| Predicate | likelyEndState |
P12716
|
FINISHED |
| Object | core-collapse supernova |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: core-collapse supernova | Statement: [Saiph, likelyEndState, core-collapse supernova]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: likelyEndState Context triple: [Saiph, likelyEndState, core-collapse supernova]
-
A.
losingState
Indicates that a particular game or competitive situation is in a condition where the player or side in question is currently losing or destined to lose under optimal play.
-
B.
ultimateState
Indicates the final or end condition that an entity or process ultimately reaches after all preceding stages or transitions.
-
C.
mayResultIn
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the potential to cause, lead to, or bring about another entity or outcome, without guaranteeing that it will occur.
-
D.
canBeConcludedWith
Indicates that one situation, process, or sequence is able to be finished, resolved, or brought to an end by another specified action or condition.
-
E.
likelyComposition
Indicates that one entity is probably a component or constituent part of another entity, though this compositional relationship is uncertain or inferred rather than definite.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0087cd3c48190b459848c72d84eb1 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c05a963bac8190bc0c33fef187875c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049f5ac988190b62ba565153aaa35 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:12 p.m.