Triple
T6060722
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Qiangic languages |
E135025
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSubgroup |
P747
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Zhongu Tibetan |
E109616
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zhongu Tibetan | Statement: [Qiangic languages, hasSubgroup, Zhongu Tibetan]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Zhongu Tibetan Context triple: [Qiangic languages, hasSubgroup, Zhongu Tibetan]
-
A.
Tibetan
chosen
Tibetan is a Sino-Tibetan language spoken primarily in Tibet and surrounding Himalayan regions, serving as the liturgical language of Tibetan Buddhism and a key marker of Tibetan cultural identity.
-
B.
Tangut
Tangut is an extinct Tibeto-Burman language once used in the Western Xia dynasty, best known today for its large and complex logographic writing system.
-
C.
Dholuo
Dholuo is a Nilotic language spoken primarily by the Luo people of western Kenya and parts of Tanzania.
-
D.
Chochenyo
Chochenyo is an indigenous Ohlone language traditionally spoken in the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay Area in California.
-
E.
Bhutia
Bhutia is a Sino-Tibetan language spoken primarily by the Bhutia community in the Himalayan regions of India, especially in Sikkim and parts of West Bengal.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00878d06881909ee78e88913bf890 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c0571fcecc8190a68e0d0668bbbfa7 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:54 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c11d197dd08190bcc6904c7c2e41aa |
completed | March 23, 2026, 10:59 a.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:10 p.m.