Triple

T6042879
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Albedo 0.39 (track) E134590 entity
Predicate hasScientificLyrics P68356 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Albedo 0.39 (track), hasScientificLyrics, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasScientificLyrics
Context triple: [Albedo 0.39 (track), hasScientificLyrics, yes]
  • A. hasLyric
    Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or track) contains or is associated with the lyrics provided by another entity.
  • B. hasPoeticLyrics
    Indicates that something (such as a song, text, or speech) contains lyrics or wording that are artistic, expressive, or characteristic of poetry.
  • C. hasExplicitLyrics
    Indicates that the referenced content contains explicit language or themes, such as profanity, sexual content, or strong violence.
  • D. hasLyricsTheme
    Indicates that the lyrics of a work primarily concern or revolve around a specified theme or subject.
  • E. hasLyricalTheme
    Indicates that one entity (typically a creative work) features or is characterized by a particular lyrical subject, topic, or theme.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c00876a69881908088a2626d3b2666 completed March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c056e108fc81908775d176ff960fad completed March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c049eb52a08190ac10fd703735f5aa completed March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c04e8d4a148190bd8f95caae978e1b completed March 22, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:08 p.m.