Triple
T6040068
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | sage-grouse |
E134520
|
entity |
| Predicate | matingDisplay |
P68321
|
FINISHED |
| Object | elaborate courtship display on leks |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: elaborate courtship display on leks | Statement: [sage-grouse, matingDisplay, elaborate courtship display on leks]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: matingDisplay Context triple: [sage-grouse, matingDisplay, elaborate courtship display on leks]
-
A.
matingSystem
Indicates the type or pattern of reproductive pairing or mating relationships that typically occurs within a species or population.
-
B.
displayedWith
Indicates that one entity is shown or presented together alongside another entity in the same context or view.
-
C.
displayMode
Indicates how content or information is visually presented or arranged to the user.
-
D.
displayState
Indicates the current visual or presentation status of an item, such as whether and how it is shown, hidden, or rendered in a user interface or display context.
-
E.
starPairing
Indicates a relationship where two stars are associated or grouped together as a pair, typically for observational, analytical, or classificatory purposes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00875db5c819099dd5bb833ec43c2 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c056cf82d481909d5161fe3643e7ed |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049eb52a08190ac10fd703735f5aa |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c04e8d4a148190bd8f95caae978e1b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:08 p.m.