Triple

T6034220
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RTCRtpEncodingParameters E134377 entity
Predicate propertyType_priority P25884 FINISHED
Object RTCPriorityType LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RTCPriorityType | Statement: [RTCRtpEncodingParameters, propertyType_priority, RTCPriorityType]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: propertyType_priority
Context triple: [RTCRtpEncodingParameters, propertyType_priority, RTCPriorityType]
  • A. typeOfPriority chosen
    Indicates the specific priority level or category assigned to something relative to other items or tasks.
  • B. planningPriority
    Indicates the relative importance or urgency assigned to an item, task, or objective when organizing or scheduling plans.
  • C. limitsPriorityOf
    Indicates that one entity imposes a maximum allowable priority level on another entity’s priority.
  • D. managementPriority
    Indicates the relative level of importance or urgency assigned to managing or addressing a particular entity, issue, or task.
  • E. supportsPriority
    Indicates that one entity provides functionality or capability for handling or honoring priority levels associated with another entity or operation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c00875db5c819099dd5bb833ec43c2 completed March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c056b220608190b156be95632cf3b3 completed March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c049e9a68c81909da0cfe4779ce9b5 completed March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:08 p.m.