Triple
T6031332
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Harvard spectral classification |
E134309
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesSpectralTypes |
P52318
|
FINISHED |
| Object | O |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: O | Statement: [Harvard spectral classification, usesSpectralTypes, O]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesSpectralTypes Context triple: [Harvard spectral classification, usesSpectralTypes, O]
-
A.
spectralClass
chosen
Indicates the classification of an astronomical object based on the characteristics of its spectrum, such as temperature and spectral features.
-
B.
hasSpectrograph
Indicates that one entity is equipped with or contains a spectrograph instrument.
-
C.
dominantSpectralType
Indicates the primary or most prevalent spectral type characterizing the electromagnetic emission of an object or region.
-
D.
hasSpectralChannel
Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a specific spectral channel or band within an electromagnetic spectrum.
-
E.
spectrographType
Indicates the specific kind or category of spectrograph associated with an instrument or observation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0087515148190a97475d412563865 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c056af89e881909652957f94317684 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049e9a68c81909da0cfe4779ce9b5 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:08 p.m.