Triple
T6017388
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Końskie County |
E133980
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUrbanRuralGminas |
P68789
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Końskie County, hasUrbanRuralGminas, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUrbanRuralGminas Context triple: [Końskie County, hasUrbanRuralGminas, true]
-
A.
hasUrbanRuralGmina
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific urban-rural gmina (a mixed urban and rural municipal administrative unit).
-
B.
hasUrbanGmina
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or contains, an urban gmina (a type of urban municipality or commune).
-
C.
hasNumberOfRuralGminas
Indicates the total count of rural gminas (rural administrative districts) associated with a given territorial unit or entity.
-
D.
hasUrbanGminaStatus
Indicates that an administrative unit holds the legal status of an urban gmina (urban municipality).
-
E.
hasRuralGmina
Indicates that an entity (typically an administrative unit) includes or is associated with a specific rural gmina as part of its jurisdiction or structure.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c008742a5c8190b9cb9c2787a3d8b3 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c04f8458588190a78aa32cbdbecfb1 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049e75b3881908be106fbcf8c68d4 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c04e8c5bfc8190b986a7071d1b23e3 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:07 p.m.