Triple
T6010354
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LHC insertion region for CMS |
E133814
|
entity |
| Predicate | upgradeIncludes |
P68729
|
FINISHED |
| Object | new low-beta quadrupoles |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: new low-beta quadrupoles | Statement: [LHC insertion region for CMS, upgradeIncludes, new low-beta quadrupoles]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: upgradeIncludes Context triple: [LHC insertion region for CMS, upgradeIncludes, new low-beta quadrupoles]
-
A.
upgradeOption
Indicates that one entity serves as a possible improved or higher-level alternative to another entity.
-
B.
upgradeType
Indicates the specific kind or category of improvement or enhancement applied to an entity relative to its previous state.
-
C.
upgradeProgram
Indicates that one entity improves, enhances, or replaces another entity’s program with a more advanced or updated version.
-
D.
upgradeOf
Indicates that one entity is a newer, improved, or more advanced version of another entity.
-
E.
upgradesFrom
Indicates that one entity is a newer or improved version that replaces or enhances another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0087361a48190905c6b55969852b8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c04f4ffa008190a8ef701b82260219 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049e4daf4819099bf870dc700e0a2 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c04e8c5bfc8190b986a7071d1b23e3 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:06 p.m.