Triple
T5999198
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carson River Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan |
E133551
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasManagementStyle |
P18551
|
FINISHED |
| Object | adaptive |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: adaptive | Statement: [Carson River Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan, hasManagementStyle, adaptive]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasManagementStyle Context triple: [Carson River Watershed Adaptive Stewardship Plan, hasManagementStyle, adaptive]
-
A.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
B.
hasTypeOfManagement
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or operates under a specified form or style of management.
-
C.
hasDecisionMakingStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses or exhibits a particular way or pattern of making decisions.
-
D.
hasManagementGoal
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific management objective or target it is intended to achieve or support.
-
E.
hasManagementPlan
Indicates that an entity is associated with a defined management plan specifying how it should be overseen, maintained, or administered.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c00870ddbc81909880fa3864f4f38d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c04ee49b708190a92c3fd1336e8ab0 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049e152e88190979ab80cb9b50321 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:05 p.m.