Triple
T59865
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Texas Legislature |
E1186
|
entity |
| Predicate | canOverrideVeto |
P2251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Texas Legislature, canOverrideVeto, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canOverrideVeto Context triple: [Texas Legislature, canOverrideVeto, yes]
-
A.
canEnforce
Indicates that one entity has the authority or capability to compel compliance with rules, decisions, or obligations upon another entity.
-
B.
canVoteOn
Indicates that an entity has the right or permission to participate in a decision-making process by casting a vote on a specific item, issue, or proposal.
-
C.
overrides
chosen
Indicates that one entity replaces, supersedes, or takes precedence over another in determining the outcome or applicable behavior.
-
D.
mayExtendTo
Indicates that something has the potential or permission to reach, continue, or be applied up to a specified limit, scope, or boundary.
-
E.
canAlsoBe
Indicates that something has an additional possible state, role, or classification beyond its primary one.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24a552ef88190a0df287d68c65cba |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:52 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a250e401288190ba12322c9c5f07c9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24e9f40908190a2f4a2111469b733 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:55 a.m.