Triple

T5983712
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Uchinanchu E133176 entity
Predicate hasDistinctCultureFrom P67732 FINISHED
Object mainland Japanese LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mainland Japanese | Statement: [Uchinanchu, hasDistinctCultureFrom, mainland Japanese]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDistinctCultureFrom
Context triple: [Uchinanchu, hasDistinctCultureFrom, mainland Japanese]
  • A. hasDistinctCulturalHeritage
    Indicates that an entity possesses a unique cultural background, traditions, or practices that distinguish it from other entities.
  • B. hasCulturalRelation
    Indicates a relationship in which entities are connected through shared, influencing, or interacting cultural practices, values, traditions, or expressions.
  • C. culturallySimilarTo
    Indicates that two entities share comparable cultural characteristics, practices, or values.
  • D. hasAssociatedCulture
    Indicates that an entity is related to, influenced by, or characterized by a particular culture.
  • E. hasCulturalConcept
    Indicates that an entity embodies, includes, or is associated with a particular cultural idea, value, practice, or construct.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c0086f45e8819098f73dd16d45ec9d completed March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c04a6c4f2481909cdcf931331b3595 completed March 22, 2026, 8 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69c049de98648190962b14fd341c93da completed March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69c04a663a4481908983048c69cba6b6 completed March 22, 2026, 8 p.m.
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:04 p.m.