Triple
T5982802
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ART |
E133157
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasArtisticApproach |
P16367
|
FINISHED |
| Object | text-based minimalism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: text-based minimalism | Statement: [ART, hasArtisticApproach, text-based minimalism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasArtisticApproach Context triple: [ART, hasArtisticApproach, text-based minimalism]
-
A.
hasArtisticFocus
Indicates that an entity’s primary artistic attention, theme, or specialization is directed toward a particular subject, style, or medium.
-
B.
hasArtisticGenre
Indicates that an entity (such as a work or creation) belongs to or is characterized by a particular artistic genre.
-
C.
hasArtisticDiscipline
Indicates that one entity practices, specializes in, or is associated with a particular artistic discipline or field.
-
D.
artisticCharacteristic
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a particular artistic quality, style, or trait in relation to another.
-
E.
hasArtDirection
Indicates that one entity is responsible for or associated with the artistic direction or visual style of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0086f45e8819098f73dd16d45ec9d |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c04a6a9f2c8190b900cd7e3ab9fe42 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 8 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c049de98648190962b14fd341c93da |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:04 p.m.