Triple
T5964730
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Evan You |
E132722
|
entity |
| Predicate | softwareEngineeringParadigm |
P11868
|
FINISHED |
| Object | component-based architecture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: component-based architecture | Statement: [Evan You, softwareEngineeringParadigm, component-based architecture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: softwareEngineeringParadigm Context triple: [Evan You, softwareEngineeringParadigm, component-based architecture]
-
A.
languageParadigm
Indicates a relationship where a programming language follows, supports, or is categorized under a particular programming paradigm.
-
B.
supportedParadigm
chosen
Indicates that one entity (such as a tool, language, or system) provides functionality or features that enable or are compatible with a particular paradigm or methodological approach.
-
C.
softwareDomain
Indicates that something belongs to, operates within, or is associated with a particular area or field of software.
-
D.
programmingLanguage
Indicates that one entity is a programming language used to create, control, or interact with the other entity.
-
E.
softwareModel
Indicates that one entity serves as a software-based representation or abstraction (a model) of another entity or system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0086c2364819091e9fe2f58fa2517 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c03fb7f8a88190a8bd45208bda4a03 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c0335a635881909c58c1ef0f97f1e8 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:03 p.m.