Triple
T5923409
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bigloo |
E131747
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOptimization |
P27179
|
FINISHED |
| Object | aggressive inlining |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: aggressive inlining | Statement: [Bigloo, hasOptimization, aggressive inlining]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOptimization Context triple: [Bigloo, hasOptimization, aggressive inlining]
-
A.
supportsOptimizationAlgorithm
Indicates that one entity is capable of running, integrating, or being compatible with a specified optimization algorithm.
-
B.
optimizationLevel
Indicates the degree or intensity to which a process, system, or solution has been refined to improve its performance or efficiency.
-
C.
optimizationType
chosen
Indicates the specific strategy or method used to improve performance or efficiency within a given process or system.
-
D.
optimizationTarget
Indicates that one entity is the goal or objective that another entity is trying to improve, optimize, or make more efficient.
-
E.
hasDesignOption
Indicates that an entity is associated with or offers a particular design alternative or configurable design choice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0085a1ed08190a7e9a8b6323fd680 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c03c9239e08190bff7ef2bd6d21ae0 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 7:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c033541d108190a34d1fde2fe9dacb |
completed | March 22, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4 p.m.